Claim · evidence · method

Each of our claims, printed beside the way to disprove it

Anyone can write “America's #1” on a web page. The only thing that distinguishes a real claim from a slogan is whether the person reading it can settle the question without asking the person who made it. So here is each one, what supports it, and precisely how you check.

The claim
What supports it
How you check it yourself
All 51 jurisdictions covered
Fifty states plus the District, each with its own written guide, all reachable from one index.
Open the coverage wall and click any entry. A missing state would be a blank link, and there are none.
Written separately, not templated
A six-word phrase comparison across every pair of pages, run automatically on each change.
Open two similar states and read the first paragraph of each. Templating shows up between neighbours faster than anywhere.
The research tool cites primary law
A retrieval pipeline where references outside the supplied source set are deleted before display.
Ask it something and follow a citation to the source it names. Then ask a general chatbot the same thing and compare.
Clinicians licensed where you live
Credentials recorded per state with a number and an expiry, and the applicable one printed on your paperwork.
Lift the licence number off the page and search your state board's own register. Free, and entirely outside our reach.
Every document can be verified
An identifier and a machine-readable mark on every document we issue, testable on a public page.
Run the check with a reference, an email and a telephone number. Then try it with a wrong combination and watch it tell you nothing.
Assessments can end in a decline
A recorded decision with a written reason, and a refund of what you paid.
Ask any competitor what proportion of their assessments end without a letter, and note what the reply is like.
Nothing clinical leaves the practice
No diagnosis on any issued document, and none reachable through the verification check.
Read a document end to end, then run the check and read what it returns. Neither contains a condition.
We ask for less than the others
No upload path for medical records; no field for a diagnosis; nothing about income or employment.
Open our screening and a competitor's side by side and count the fields before payment is requested.
The Resource Center is free
Sixty-three pages and the research tool, with no account, no paywall and no email capture.
Use it in a private window. If anything asks who you are before answering, we have overstated this.
Refunds cannot double-pay or vanish
A refund path that records intent, calls the provider with a fixed key, then records the outcome separately.
Harder to test from outside — but if a refund ever arrives twice or not at all, that is a defect and we want to hear about it.
51Jurisdictions with their own guide
2,485Page pairs compared for repetition
58Primary sources behind the research tool
0Shared six-word phrases found

Two things we deliberately do not claim

Leaving these out is part of what makes the rest worth reading.

Absent by choice

That a landlord will accept it
No one is able to say in advance how a given individual, board or committee will decide, and a provider guaranteeing that outcome has undertaken something with nothing behind it. What we can do is make the document checkable, correct, and issued under a credential valid where you live.
That an outcome is certain before anyone has looked
A clinical judgement reached in advance of the consultation is not a judgement. We will tell you at screening whether the position looks promising, and we will not tell you what the professional is going to conclude, because at that point nobody knows.

If any row in the table above does not survive your checking it, that is a defect rather than a difference of opinion, and we would rather hear about it from you than leave it standing. The companion page lists everything else we publish that a marketing site would ordinarily leave out.